It is a 1 sampling (no oversampling), no digital/analog filter, tube (ECC82/ECL82) based converter. Then I heard an AudioNote DAC 4.1 (very, very expensive) which really blew my mind. Although the Cambridge, the Musical Fidelity and MusicHall DAC are ok, they did not deliver the WOW effect I was looking for. I also listened to several of those, including digital, hybrid, and analog/tube amplified DAC’s. I read many articles about Ayre (very expensive), Naim and Audio Research (expensive) DAC’s, as well as Musical Fidelity, Cambridge, Chordette, Arcam and MusicHall (affordable) DACs. However, I realized that a new high-end DAC might actually change my music listening experience, so I did some research. However the convenience in using a streaming server with high quality 24bit/196kbits to play continuous music, versus having to exchange the CD’s on my player, is soo much more, that I opted for removing the cdplayer from my living room. So the older dac embedded in my 10 year old Sony 30ES cdplayer, is sounding only slightly better than the onboard dac in my Marantz receiver. Also depending on the output amplification of the analog signal, the sound can range from a harsh, clinical sound to a warm, colorful sound.Īfter listening one quiet evening to my music, either streamed via my AirportExpress or on my CD-player, the difference in quality was very small. CD-players have an onboard dac, but as these devices evolve over time, the more modern dacs are more efficient than the older ones. Such a digital-analog converter is called a DAC. In every digital audio device there is a converter to turn the digitally stored music into analog signals before you can connect it to your hifi. AudioNote kit DAC 2.1 Signature series and my CDplayer Sony 30ESīut let’s backup a bit and let me explain.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |